Hi Guys..thanks for the opportunity to share and be part of a new forum..Some of you may have seen this elsewhere as its only just broke cover since a 3 year restoration...I can go through the resto if anyone wants to see the journey ...A classic Mini Van with a mix of careful upgrades and modifications keeping it a subtle as possible..ish..
Thanks chaps the picture above was pretty much the first time I ventured out to a local car meet ..im still only about 60 miles in so its early days ..
My first car was a Mini Van, which most folk can't believe as I'm 6'4" short. Always wanted to put a Jag V12 in the back - the dreams of youth. I would gladly donate a vital organ for your van.
I've not seen a grille like that before is it an Austin?
Thanks Ivan the grille has been the subject of many questions..its from a Aston Martin DB4GT...Obviously cut down to fit the mini..just the outer trim to finish over winter..
Couple of in progress shots...in the first picture its clear I'm running with coil spring damping instead of rubber cones..not impressed and I will be changing these in the near future .. Untitled by
My last Mini van cost me a hundred quid, I ran it for a few years and sold it for one and a half and thought I’d done really well. That was a long time ago and to be honest I probably did do well. Let’s say it wasn’t quite as nice as this one which has to be one of the best ones out there.
Love this van - a lesson in how to "do" a period look.
I've never had coil springs on any of my old Minis so would be interested in hearing the pitfalls. Is it possibly due to lack of weight in the rear, or something else?
Love this van - a lesson in how to "do" a period look.
I've never had coil springs on any of my old Minis so would be interested in hearing the pitfalls. Is it possibly due to lack of weight in the rear, or something else?
They used rubber cones because they give rising rate ‘springing’.
If you loaded up a standard Mini with four people and luggage and if it had normal springs it would be on the bump stops before you set off. This doesn’t happen with the rubber. Issigonis and Moulton knew what they were doing.
The biggest problem with this van is having seen it in the flesh so to speak is it's so dam small compared to how the pictures make it look and the pictures don't do it justice it is such an attractive looker, very very nice all round.
My last Mini van cost me a hundred quid, I ran it for a few years and sold it for one and a half and thought I’d done really well. That was a long time ago and to be honest I probably did do well. Let’s say it wasn’t quite as nice as this one which has to be one of the best ones out there.
Thats pretty much the gist of most previous peoples ownership history with a van as they were more or less throw away items and a tool for a daily workhorse..To be honest I never considered restoring one as I've always preferred MK1'S & 2's..this just came about via a friend and as I was looking for a project seemed to make sense to give it a go and see if I warmed to it..
Love this van - a lesson in how to "do" a period look.
I've never had coil springs on any of my old Minis so would be interested in hearing the pitfalls. Is it possibly due to lack of weight in the rear, or something else?
Thanks Morris appreciate the comments and as of yet its only been to a couple of car meets and its had a fantastic response..Issue with springs is various..they can become unseated in the retaining ring in the front subframe tower by either going over bumpy roads or even by just jacking the car up as they do not have anything to retain them.. the rubber cones fit tightly into the tower ring and stay put..ride wise its very smooth but very bouncy over bumps even with the low ride height..if it was heavier it may improve but not enough so I have some cones already so will replace soon as possible..